DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Smart Forfour vs 2016 Suzuki Jimny Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Jimny

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

48.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeSuzuki
ForfourModelJimny
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
151 km/hTop speed140 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1328 cc
61 HPPower84 HP
91 NmTorque110 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
28 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/65 R 15; 185/60 R 15Tyre size205/70 R15 96S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3695 mm
1665 mmWidth1600 mm
1554 mmHeight1705 mm
895 KgWeight1135 Kg
2494 mmWheelbase2250 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Smart Forfour and 2016 Suzuki Jimny approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Jimny leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…