DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Jimny vs 2016 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Jimny

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

48.5–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSmart
JimnyModelForfour
2016Model year2016
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
140 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1328 ccEngine displacement999 cc
84 HPPower61 HP
110 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank28 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15 96STyre size165/65 R 15; 185/60 R 15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3695 mmLength3395 mm
1600 mmWidth1665 mm
1705 mmHeight1554 mm
1135 KgWeight895 Kg
2250 mmWheelbase2494 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Jimny and 2016 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Jimny leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…