2016 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 0.9 (109 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
2016 Smart Forfour vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo Allstar 2016 1.2 TSI 90 HPOverall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart ForfourSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
SmartMakeVolkswagen
ForfourModelPolo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Smart ForfourSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
180 km/hTop speed184 km/h
898 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque160 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart ForfourSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart ForfourSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 TwinamicGears7
—TransmissionDSG
185/45 R17; 205/40 R17Tyre size15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart ForfourSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
3525 mmLength3972 mm
1665 mmWidth1682 mm
1543 mmHeight1453 mm
1095 KgWeight1139 kg
—Luggage capacity280 lt
2494 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Smart Forfour and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…