2016 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 0.9 (109 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
2016 Smart Forfour vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.3 JTDm (95 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Smart Forfour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart ForfourSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
SmartMakeAlfa Romeo
ForfourModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3
Performance
Smart ForfourSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
10,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
898 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
109 HPPower95 HP
170 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart ForfourSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption3,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart ForfourSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 TwinamicGears5
185/45 R17; 205/40 R17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart ForfourSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
3525 mmLength4063 mm
1665 mmWidth1720 mm
1543 mmHeight1446 mm
1095 KgWeight1150 Kg
2494 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Smart Forfour and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…