DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Smart Crossblade vs 1999 Daewoo Matiz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Crossblade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeDaewoo
CrossbladeModelMatiz
2002Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

16,8 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
135 km/hTop speed144 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement796 cc
70 HPPower52 HP
100 NmTorque69 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank38 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size145/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3495 mm
1515 mmWidth1495 mm
1549 mmHeight1480 mm
730 KgWeight725 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Smart Crossblade and 1999 Daewoo Matiz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Crossblade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…