1999 • Daewoo
Tico
Daewoo Tico 0.8 (48 Hp) 1999Overall Score38.5/100
1999 Daewoo Tico vs 2002 Smart Crossblade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Smart Crossblade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo TicoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
DaewooMakeSmart
TicoModelCrossblade
1999Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Daewoo TicoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
17,0 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
143 km/hTop speed135 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement599 cc
48 HPPower70 HP
64 NmTorque100 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo TicoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank22 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo TicoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
135 R12Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo TicoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
3340 mmLength2500 mm
1400 mmWidth1515 mm
1395 mmHeight1549 mm
640 KgWeight730 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase1812 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Daewoo Tico and 2002 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Crossblade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…