DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Skoda Superb vs 2005 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeNissan
SuperbModelFrontier
2004Model year2005
LiftbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
219 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
155 HPPower154 HP
310 NmTorque231 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4803 mmLength5220 mm
1765 mmWidth1850 mm
1469 mmHeight1879 mm
1250 KgWeight—
2803 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Skoda Superb and 2005 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…