DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZT vs 2004 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationSkoda Superb
MGMakeSkoda
ZTModelSuperb
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationSkoda Superb
9,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
211 km/hTop speed219 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
160 HPPower155 HP
230 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationSkoda Superb
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption10,0 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationSkoda Superb
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/45 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationSkoda Superb
4740 mmLength4803 mm
1780 mmWidth1765 mm
1410 mmHeight1469 mm
1485 KgWeight1250 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2803 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZT and 2004 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…