DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Skoda Superb vs 2005 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZT
SkodaMakeMG
SuperbModelZT
2004Model year2005
LiftbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZT
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
219 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
155 HPPower160 HP
310 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZT
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZT
4803 mmLength4740 mm
1765 mmWidth1780 mm
1469 mmHeight1410 mm
1250 KgWeight1485 Kg
2803 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Skoda Superb and 2005 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…