2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (210 Hp) 2016Overall Score78.75/100
2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Skoda Superb Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 2.0 TSI (220 Hp) 2016Overall Score79.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Superb
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
FordMakeSkoda
MondeoModelSuperb
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
7,9 s0–100 km/h5,8 s
233 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
210 HPPower220 HP
450 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank66 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowerShiftGears6 DSG
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
4871 mmLength4861 mm
1852 mmWidth1864 mm
1482 mmHeight1468 mm
1525 KgWeight1550 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2841 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…