DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Skoda Superb vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZR
SkodaMakeMG
SuperbModelZR
2003Model year2003
LiftbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZR
10,1 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
205 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower113 HP
285 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda SuperbSpecificationMG ZR
4803 mmLength4011 mm
1765 mmWidth1690 mm
1469 mmHeight1400 mm
1496 KgWeight1155 Kg
2803 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Skoda Superb and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…