DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Superb

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSkoda Superb
BMWMakeSkoda
Z3ModelSuperb
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeLiftback
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSkoda Superb
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
196 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
118 HPPower131 HP
190 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSkoda Superb
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank62 lt
11 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSkoda Superb
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSkoda Superb
4050 mmLength4803 mm
1740 mmWidth1765 mm
1288 mmHeight1469 mm
1220 KgWeight1496 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2803 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…