DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelS80
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
225 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
175 HPPower200 HP
385 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4822 mm
1743 mmWidth1832 mm
1430 mmHeight1434 mm
1385 KgWeight1495 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…