DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Skoda Superb vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeFiat
SuperbModelBravo
2012Model year2012
LiftbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4/5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
201 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
200 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4336 mm
1783 mmWidth1792 mm
1461 mmHeight1498 mm
1425 KgWeight1260 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Skoda Superb and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…