DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2012 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeSkoda
MiToModelSuperb
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
2/3Doors4/5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
198 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
206 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4838 mm
1720 mmWidth1783 mm
1440 mmHeight1461 mm
1145 KgWeight1425 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2761 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2012 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…