DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Skoda Superb vs 2013 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Superb

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeHonda
SuperbModelFIT
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
199 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
123 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank32 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4838 mmLength3955 mm
1817 mmWidth1695 mm
1510 mmHeight1525 mm
1504 KgWeight1080 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Skoda Superb and 2013 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…