DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda FIT vs 2013 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Superb

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSkoda
FITModelSuperb
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
110 HPPower123 HP
134 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4838 mm
1695 mmWidth1817 mm
1525 mmHeight1510 mm
1080 KgWeight1504 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2761 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda FIT and 2013 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…