DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelC70
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
212 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
150 HPPower200 HP
305 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4716 mm
1755 mmWidth1817 mm
1415 mmHeight1429 mm
1385 KgWeight1570 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…