DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar X-type vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlfa Romeo
X-typeModel156
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
207 km/hTop speed212 km/h
2099 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
156 HPPower150 HP
196 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4716 mmLength4430 mm
1789 mmWidth1755 mm
1483 mmHeight1415 mm
1515 KgWeight1385 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar X-type and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…