DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolkswagen
Rapid SpacebackModelPolo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
183 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
230 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size215/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4304 mmLength3987 mm
1706 mmWidth1698 mm
1459 mmHeight1488 mm
1229 kgWeight1139 Kg
384 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2469 mm

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…