DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs 2017 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeSkoda
Rapid SpacebackModelFabia
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
183 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
230 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption3,9 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption3,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4304 mmLength3992 mm
1706 mmWidth1732 mm
1459 mmHeight1467 mm
1229 kgWeight1165 Kg
384 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2470 mm

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorUSB Port
Skoda Fabia

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback and 2017 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…