DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda RapidSpecificationAudi Q3
SkodaMakeAudi
RapidModelQ3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Skoda RapidSpecificationAudi Q3
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
209 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
200 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda RapidSpecificationAudi Q3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda RapidSpecificationAudi Q3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 DSGGears6
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 235/55 R17; 235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda RapidSpecificationAudi Q3
4483 mmLength4388 mm
1706 mmWidth1831 mm
1461 mmHeight1608 mm
1151 KgWeight1385 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…