2016 • Audi
Q3
Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (125 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.25/100
2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Skoda Rapid Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.4 TSI (125 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Rapid
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
AudiMakeSkoda
Q3ModelRapid
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi Q3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
10,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
194 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
220 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi Q3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 DSG
215/65 R16; 235/55 R17; 235/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi Q3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
4388 mmLength4483 mm
1831 mmWidth1706 mm
1608 mmHeight1461 mm
1385 KgWeight1151 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2602 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…