2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.4 TDI (90 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2010 Volkswagen Golf Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volkswagen
Golf
Volkswagen Golf 2.0 TSI (270 Hp) 2010Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Golf
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 24.25 points.
58.25–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
SkodaMakeVolkswagen
RapidModelGolf
2016Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
11,7 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
183 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
90 HPPower270 HP
230 NmTorque350 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption—
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
4483 mmLength4213 mm
1706 mmWidth1786 mm
1461 mmHeight1407 mm
1159 KgWeight—
2602 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Rapid and 2010 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 24.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…