DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Fiesta vs 2016 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSkoda
FiestaModelRapid
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
175 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1387 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
96 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,4 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3969 mmLength4483 mm
1764 mmWidth1706 mm
1495 mmHeight1461 mm
1054 kgWeight1159 Kg
276 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2602 mm

Additional Features

Ford FiestaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB Port
Skoda Rapid

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Fiesta and 2016 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…