2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.4 TDI (90 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2004 Volkswagen Bora Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volkswagen
Bora
Volkswagen Bora 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Rapid
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.
58.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
SkodaMakeVolkswagen
RapidModelBora
2016Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
11,7 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
183 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
230 NmTorque148 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Bora
4483 mmLength4376 mm
1706 mmWidth1735 mm
1461 mmHeight1446 mm
1159 KgWeight1360 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2519 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Rapid and 2004 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…