2000 • Skoda
Octavia
Skoda Octavia 1.9 TDI 4X4 (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Skoda Octavia vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Octavia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
SkodaMakeMitsubishi
OctaviaModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
13,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
184 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
101 HPPower116 HP
240 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4513 mmLength4435 mm
1731 mmWidth1710 mm
1481 mmHeight1405 mm
1405 KgWeight1130 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Skoda Octavia and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…