2000 • Skoda
Felicia
Skoda Felicia 1.3 (58 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
2000 Skoda Felicia vs 2000 Ford KA Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
KA
Ford KA 1.3 i (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Felicia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FeliciaSpecificationFord KA
SkodaMakeFord
FeliciaModelKA
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Skoda FeliciaSpecificationFord KA
15,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
145 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1289 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
58 HPPower60 HP
94 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FeliciaSpecificationFord KA
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FeliciaSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Skoda FeliciaSpecificationFord KA
3883 mmLength3620 mm
1635 mmWidth1639 mm
1420 mmHeight1383 mm
935 KgWeight890 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2448 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Skoda Felicia and 2000 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Felicia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…