DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford KA vs 2000 Skoda Felicia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Felicia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSkoda
KAModelFelicia
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1289 cc
60 HPPower58 HP
105 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3883 mm
1639 mmWidth1635 mm
1383 mmHeight1420 mm
890 KgWeight935 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford KA and 2000 Skoda Felicia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Felicia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…