2010 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.6 HTP 16V (105 Hp) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
2010 Skoda Fabia vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.6 CD (95 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 2
SkodaMakeMazda
FabiaModel2
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 2
10,1 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
190 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
105 HPPower95 HP
153 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14; 195/55 R15; 205/45 R16Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 2
4239 mmLength3920 mm
1642 mmWidth1695 mm
1498 mmHeight1475 mm
1145 KgWeight1025 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2490 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Skoda Fabia and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…