2010 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.6 CD (95 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.25/100
2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Skoda Fabia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.6 HTP 16V (105 Hp) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
MazdaMakeSkoda
2ModelFabia
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
175 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower105 HP
205 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size165/70 R14; 195/55 R15; 205/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
3920 mmLength4239 mm
1695 mmWidth1642 mm
1475 mmHeight1498 mm
1025 KgWeight1145 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2462 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…