DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Skoda Fabia vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 25
SkodaMakeRover
FabiaModel25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 25
14,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
168 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
75 HPPower103 HP
195 NmTorque123 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 25
3960 mmLength3990 mm
1645 mmWidth1688 mm
1450 mmHeight1417 mm
1130 KgWeight1105 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Skoda Fabia and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…