DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationSkoda Fabia
MGMakeSkoda
ZRModelFabia
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationSkoda Fabia
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
179 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
103 HPPower75 HP
123 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationSkoda Fabia
4011 mmLength3960 mm
1690 mmWidth1645 mm
1400 mmHeight1450 mm
1060 KgWeight1130 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…