DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 David Brown Mini Remastered Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

David Brown Mini Remastered

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

48.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeDavid Brown
FabiaModelMini Remastered
2016Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
160 km/hTop speed145 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
60 HPPower71 HP
95 NmTorque118 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank34 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3992 mmLength3050 mm
1732 mmWidth1470 mm
1467 mmHeight1330 mm
1055 KgWeight740 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2040 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Fabia and 2017 David Brown Mini Remastered approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, David Brown Mini Remastered leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…