DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 David Brown Mini Remastered vs 2016 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

David Brown Mini Remastered

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

48.5–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

David BrownMakeSkoda
Mini RemasteredModelFabia
2017Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h15,7 s
145 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement999 cc
71 HPPower60 HP
118 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3050 mmLength3992 mm
1470 mmWidth1732 mm
1330 mmHeight1467 mm
740 KgWeight1055 Kg
2040 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 David Brown Mini Remastered and 2016 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, David Brown Mini Remastered leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…