DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda 626 vs 1995 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSeat
626ModelToledo
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

—Length4321 mm
—Width1662 mm
—Height1421 mm
—Weight1080 Kg
—Wheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda 626 and 1995 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…