DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Seat Leon vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat LeonSpecificationMG ZT
SeatMakeMG
LeonModelZT
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Seat LeonSpecificationMG ZT
9,1 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
215 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1900 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
150 HPPower160 HP
0 NmTorque215 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat LeonSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Seat LeonSpecificationMG ZT
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size215/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Seat LeonSpecificationMG ZT
—Length4740 mm
—Width1780 mm
—Height1410 mm
—Weight1440 Kg
—Wheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Seat Leon and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…