DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Seat Leon vs 1998 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMitsubishi
LeonModelFTO
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
211 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
320 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption16,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/60 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4183 mmLength4320 mm
1742 mmWidth1735 mm
1457 mmHeight1300 mm
1356 KgWeight1150 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Seat Leon and 1998 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…