DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1998 Seat Leon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSeat
FTOModelLeon
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
220 km/hTop speed211 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
16,6 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/60 R15 HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4183 mm
1735 mmWidth1742 mm
1300 mmHeight1457 mm
1150 KgWeight1356 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi FTO and 1998 Seat Leon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…