DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Seat Exeo vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Exeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeOpel
ExeoModelCascada
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
225 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
160 HPPower165 HP
250 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4696 mm
1772 mmWidth1839 mm
1430 mmHeight1443 mm
1495 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Seat Exeo and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Exeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…