DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Bertone Freeclimber vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BertoneMakeAudi
FreeclimberModel80
1992Model year1992
—Body typeSedan
4Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
175 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
100 HPPower70 HP
0 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4405 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1395 mm
1550 KgWeight1030 Kg
—Wheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Bertone Freeclimber and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…