DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Bertone Freeclimber Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeBertone
80ModelFreeclimber
1992Model year1992
SedanBody type—
5Seats4
4Doors—

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
168 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
70 HPPower100 HP
118 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4405 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1395 mmHeight—
1030 KgWeight1550 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Bertone Freeclimber approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…