2016 • Seat
Ateca
Seat Ateca Reference 2016 1.0 TSI 115 HPOverall Score67.25/100
2016 Seat Ateca vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI (115 Hp) 2017Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat AtecaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
SeatMakeVolkswagen
AtecaModelPolo
2016Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Seat AtecaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
183 km/hTop speed200 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Seat AtecaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat AtecaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat AtecaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4363 mmLength4053 mm
1841 mmWidth1751 mm
1615 mmHeight1461 mm
1205 kgWeight1155 Kg
510 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2548 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Seat Ateca and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…