DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Seat Ateca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeSeat
PoloModelAteca
2017Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
200 km/hTop speed183 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
185/65 R15Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4053 mmLength4363 mm
1751 mmWidth1841 mm
1461 mmHeight1615 mm
1155 KgWeight1205 kg
—Luggage capacity510 lt
2548 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Seat AtecaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlDriver Fatigue DetectionTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Seat Ateca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…