DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Seat Arosa vs 2000 Opel Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Corsa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeOpel
ArosaModelCorsa
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
160 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
116 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3536 mmLength3740 mm
1639 mmWidth1610 mm
1480 mmHeight1420 mm
930 KgWeight892 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2445 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Seat Arosa and 2000 Opel Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Corsa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…