2000 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.4 (68 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Skoda Fabia vs 1998 Seat Arosa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.4 (60 Hp) 1998Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSeat Arosa
SkodaMakeSeat
FabiaModelArosa
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSeat Arosa
15,0 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
162 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1397 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
68 HPPower60 HP
120 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSeat Arosa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank34 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSeat Arosa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14; 185/60 R14Tyre size155/70R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSeat Arosa
3960 mmLength3536 mm
1645 mmWidth1639 mm
1450 mmHeight1480 mm
1065 KgWeight930 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2323 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Skoda Fabia and 1998 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…