DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Seat Arosa vs 2003 Opel Meriva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeOpel
ArosaModelMeriva
2002Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
164 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
61 HPPower70 HP
140 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank53 lt
3,6 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3529 mmLength4042 mm
1621 mmWidth1694 mm
1455 mmHeight1624 mm
860 KgWeight1320 Kg
2319 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Seat Arosa and 2003 Opel Meriva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…