DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Meriva vs 2002 Seat Arosa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSeat
MerivaModelArosa
2003Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
157 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1191 cc
70 HPPower61 HP
170 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption2,7 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size155/65R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4042 mmLength3529 mm
1694 mmWidth1621 mm
1624 mmHeight1455 mm
1320 KgWeight860 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2319 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Meriva and 2002 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…