DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Seat Altea vs 2013 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
SeatMakeHonda
AlteaModelFIT
2013Model year2013
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
10,3 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
55 ltFuel tank32 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
4282 mmLength3955 mm
1768 mmWidth1695 mm
1576 mmHeight1525 mm
1439 KgWeight1080 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Seat Altea and 2013 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…