DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda FIT vs 2013 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
HondaMakeSeat
FITModelAltea
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
134 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
3955 mmLength4282 mm
1695 mmWidth1768 mm
1525 mmHeight1576 mm
1080 KgWeight1439 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda FIT and 2013 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…